492
on
4407
and I would instruct the
Colonial Secretary to proceed accordingly.
M. de M. seems to think that the
despatch on 4407
was intended as
a personal reflection on himself. He
might be told that this was not the
case intended.
It is proposed that
M. Horspool refuses the increase on
the condition of re-engagement: his present engagement expires next
month and up
to that date he was contracted for a certain salary which he receives: if therefore he declines to
re-engage
he has no claim to increase
of pay
and it should not be
given to him
on people to re-engage.
There are 2 points in his letter
which should be noticed.
1. He asks that his pay should at
least be as much as
that of the
1st clerk.
The 1st clerk gets $1920 dollars,
M. Horspool
if he re-engaged he would get
1440 + 480 =
1920 -
the same amount; besides the additional privileges to which M. Deane
refers.
2. He states
that good
Service allowance
is not allowed to count towards
a policeman's pension: he also
states that if he is re-engaged
his personal allowance
of $480 should not be considered
as a good Service allowance & should count for pension.
In noticing these points add that if he does not like the terms offered,
they cannot
be raised.
C.P.D. 16 July
MINUTE PAPER.
492
on
4407
and I would instruct the
Jooumor to proceed accordingly
Mideame seerns to think that the
despatch on 4407.
a
was intended as
· personal reflexion on himself. he
word
might be told that this was not the
Cute intended.
is
proposed rabegiven
M: Horspool refuses the increase on
A
Condition of reengagement: his prescut engagement expires next
up
many d cep
to that date he wore for contracted for a certain salary which he receives: if them fore he declines to
has no claim to increase
le engage
he
of pay
d it should not be
him
given
peuple to rege
There
2 points in his latter
༢
which should be noticed.
I he as tho that his pray should at
MINUTE PAPER.
least be as much as
that of the
1st clark
The 1st cleek gets 1920 dollars,
Mi Hasha
if he reculisted he would get
1440 +480
1920-
the same
amount; besides the additional privileges to which M: Deane
Hi Horsport
_2. the states
Λ
refers
states that good
Severice
allowance
A is not allowed to count towards
a policemans peusion: Ithi alt if h
vengaged
his
personal allowance
be considered mucly
480 should not be considered
as a
good Service allowance & should count for pension
In noticing these points add that if he does not like the terms offered,
cannot
he can have them raised
C.P.d 16 July
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.